System Design AI
All designs

Technical program managementadvanced

16. Migrate payment processors without a flag day

Create a gated migration plan when engineering, finance and support have different definitions of success.

The brief

Own a 12-week migration from one payment processor to another. Produce an executable program plan with evidence-based go/no-go decisions rather than a list of meetings. No detailed service diagram is required if the dependency and decision flow is clear.

  • Checkout, subscriptions, finance reconciliation, risk and support are owned by five different teams.
  • New purchases can be routed gradually, but existing subscription tokens cannot all be transferred automatically.
  • Finance closes books monthly. The legacy contract expires after week 12; a one-month extension is possible at a known extra cost.

Constraints

Initial program window≤ 12 weeks
Declare the initial implementation and rollout window; an extension must be a separately approved contingency.
Financial reconciliation
No cohort expands until payment, refund and settlement reconciliation is demonstrated with an owner and measurable gate.
Rollback boundary
Explain which transactions can be rerouted and which must be reconciled on the original processor.
Legacy subscriptions
Account for non-transferable tokens and any customer action without assuming token portability.

What to cover

  1. 01

    Scope and success measures

    State measurable customer, financial and operational outcomes, plus explicit non-goals.

  2. 02

    Dependencies and critical path

    Assign accountable roles and sequence token work, integration, finance validation, cohorts and support readiness.

  3. 03

    Launch and rollback gates

    Define evidence, thresholds, decision owners and rollback boundaries for each cohort.

  4. 04

    Risk and decision register

    Prioritize risks, give leading indicators and decision deadlines, and compare paying for an extension with accepting residual risk.

  5. 05

    Week-eight intervention

    Assume reconciliation breaks for 0.4% of a pilot cohort in week eight. Explain containment, escalation and re-planning.

Worked designs

No worked design has been published for this brief yet. You can start an attempt and share your approach in the discussion.

Review rubric

AI feedback uses these criteria. Scores are practice feedback.

Measurable program outcomes

Success, scope and non-goals align customer, financial and operational outcomes.

20points

Dependencies and accountability

Identifies critical path, accountable roles, real prerequisites and resource contention.

25points

Evidence-based decisions

Cohort gates, reconciliation and irreversible transaction boundaries govern launch and rollback.

30points

Risk response and re-planning

Prioritizes with evidence, escalates to named roles and makes time/cost/risk tradeoffs explicit.

25points

Discussion

Share an approach, ask a question, or tag @Coach.

Share your interview experience

Published under your alias as a community report. Leave out interviewer names and confidential material.

Loading discussion…