24. Organize a fair maker-market application process
Process more applications than available tables with clear decisions, ownership and a waitlist.
The brief
Design the operating process for a fictional neighborhood maker market with 60 tables and 120 applications. Organizers need a consistent way to review applications, offer places and handle cancellations. Use a checklist, table or written workflow; a new software system is optional.
- Two coordinators have 18 combined hours over three weeks for reviewing, contacting applicants and preparing the final list.
- Some applications are incomplete or duplicated; applicants can reply by email or phone.
- Selection must follow published event-fit criteria. A declined offer frees a table, and late cancellations currently disappear into personal inboxes.
Constraints
- Coordinator time≤ 18 staff-hours
- Declare the total coordinator-hours required; include follow-up and cancellation handling.
- Table capacity≤ 60 tables
- Declare the maximum number of simultaneously confirmed table offers.
- Consistent selection
- Use event-fit criteria published before review; do not rely on personal connections or unrelated personal characteristics.
- Decision trail
- Maintain a minimal record of status, decision reason and next owner without publishing private contact details.
What to cover
- 01
Statuses and ownership
Define intake, duplicate checking, incomplete follow-up, review, offer, confirmation and waitlist handoffs.
- 02
Work plan
Estimate time per activity and reserve some capacity for exceptions; explain what to simplify if the estimate exceeds 18 hours.
- 03
Exception walkthrough
Trace a duplicate application, an offer with no reply and a cancellation after the final list is sent.
- 04
Quality and communication
Give a sample applicant update, a decision-check method and a signal that the process needs intervention.
Worked designs
No worked design has been published for this brief yet. You can start an attempt and share your approach in the discussion.
Review rubric
AI feedback uses these criteria. Scores are practice feedback.
Clear ownership and state
Each application has a comprehensible status, next action and owner through confirmation or closure.
Realistic work allocation
Arithmetic and time allowances fit the coordinator budget, with an explicit overload choice.
Consistent and private decisions
Published criteria, traceable reasons and contact privacy support consistent treatment.
Exceptions and quality checks
Duplicate, unanswered and cancelled offers are recovered without losing a table or applicant, with useful monitoring.
Discussion
Share an approach, ask a question, or tag @Coach.
Loading discussion…