47. Design an Online Judge like LeetCode
Run strangers' code safely in single-use microVMs, return verdicts within 5 seconds, and rank 100,000 contestants live.
The brief
Design an Online Judge like LeetCode. Run strangers' code safely in single-use microVMs, return verdicts within 5 seconds, and rank 100,000 contestants live. Work from the scoping questions below. State assumptions for any unspecified load, guarantee or target, then trace your design end to end. Explain one difficult case and a credible alternative; the worked example is a reference, not a required implementation.
- Set the scope: How big is a contest? How fast is a verdict?
- Define the contract: How hostile is the code? Which languages?
- Test the boundaries: How live is the leaderboard? Everyday load? Scoring?
Constraints
- Explicit scope and guarantees
- Resolve the scoping questions for an Online Judge like LeetCode. Separate stated behavior from assumptions, and identify what is outside your design.
- Supported operating targets
- Declare relevant volume, latency, freshness, quality or cost targets with units. Show calculations or an evaluation plan that can test them; unspecified targets are your assumptions, not hidden pass criteria.
- Failure and boundary behavior
- Explain how your guarantees hold in a difficult case relevant to this subject. Address: Everyday load? Scoring?
What to cover
- 01
Scope and behavior contract
Identify users, required behavior and exclusions. Answer: How big is a contest? How fast is a verdict?
- 02
State and interfaces
Define the information owned by the system and the inputs, outputs and errors at its boundaries. Resolve: How hostile is the code? Which languages?
- 03
Capacity and operating targets
Estimate the dominant workload and resource demand with units and explicit assumptions. For a learned system, also state how quality is measured and what data is available.
- 04
Architecture and central flow
Draw or describe the responsibilities needed for an Online Judge like LeetCode. Trace a representative request, event or job from its input to a visible result; identify durable state owners.
- 05
Failure and boundary walkthrough
Walk through a difficult case step by step, including detection and recovery. Consider: How live is the leaderboard? Everyday load? Scoring?
- 06
Tradeoffs and operations
Compare a credible alternative using your chosen workload and guarantees. Explain a remaining risk, a signal to watch and when you would change the design.
Worked designs
Explore the architecture and decisions, then build on an example with Coach.
Review rubric
AI feedback uses these criteria. Scores are practice feedback.
Scope and contracts
The scoping questions have explicit, consistent answers.
End-to-end design
State ownership and the central flow satisfy the chosen scope.
Operating evidence
Calculations or evaluations support the declared targets.
Boundaries and tradeoffs
A difficult case and an alternative are traced concretely.
Discussion
Share an approach, ask a question, or tag @Coach.
Loading discussion…